To reduce carbon dioxide emissions, the Ministry of Supply and Marketing in Baling Petrochemical operation of small boilers, proposed the “coal carbon content of 16%” of the benchmark index, launched by the team learn each other than each other, efforts to reduce the carbon content of coal.

Since ancient times, humans by inhalation to sustain life, access to energy through combustion, it is considered right and proper thing. But now, because too much carbon dioxide emissions, mankind begin to limit the natural thing. Limit of course can not help but gasp, can only start from the burning restrictions. Thus, restrictions on industrial emissions of carbon dioxide carbon tax came into being. CCIN reporter recently learned from the National Energy Research Institute, the National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Finance of the carbon tax carbon tax project group has now completed investigation report, China’s carbon tax, the veil is being lifted.

Most in the industry believe that the introduction of a carbon tax in China is an indispensable means to achieve a low carbon economy. This is China’s economic structural adjustment and transition, reduce international trade friction has an important role.

NDRC Energy Research Institute, Centre for Energy Environment and Climate Change Xu Huaqing, director, served as a Chinese delegation attended the end of last year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. He CCIN reporters about the venue in Copenhagen encounter a scenario: A U.S. delegation of officials with him to cross-examination: “In the past 10 years, China’s industrial carbon dioxide emissions increased by 100% more than this an industrial emissions growth rate is sustainable it? “

Experts believe that the United States and other developed countries has been to “fair carbon emissions,” as the solution to the problem of the basic principles of global warming. They did not introduce a carbon tax on countries that impose carbon tariffs on imports highly likely. In June 2009 Bonn, Germany, the United Nations climate change conference, representatives of some countries impose carbon tariffs on the proposal, that is not implemented mandatory greenhouse gas emission reduction of the national implementation of the additional tariffs.

In this case, how the Chinese do? Instead of letting our carbon developed countries levy tariffs to subsidize his own business, as our front-end carbon tax, income tax subsidies to their own business, to achieve the adjustment and optimization of industrial structure, into a virtuous path of sustainable development goals . China’s introduction of a carbon tax if they re-sign into a carbon tariff on double taxation, while double taxation is a violation of WTO agreements. Carbon taxes can reduce friction in international trade and the risk of damage, and increase our tax revenue.

Lianyungang Soda Plant South of the company last year, adding a new 0.6 meter diameter pipeline, to reduce carbon dioxide in the pipeline transportation of resistance.

The so-called carbon tax, in accordance with the processing of industrial products, how much carbon dioxide emissions tax imposed. June 4, 1992, held in Rio de Janeiro United Nations Conference for Environment and Development. The Conference adopted the “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.” This is the full control of the world’s first carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions to address global warming to human economic and social negative impact of international conventions. After the signing of the Convention, Sweden was the first country to fuel consumer carbon tax countries.

Currently there Sweden, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway and other countries in the domestic implementation of a carbon tax policy, France is also preparing to introduce a carbon tax this year. The United States put the eye outward, from the carbon tax revenues of other countries. June 26, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a “Clean Energy Security Act”, the bill authorizes the U.S. government, for the products exported to the United States can accept carbon tariffs, 1 ton of carbon dioxide tax of 10 to 70 dollars, no later than implemented from 2020.

On the carbon tax, China as early as 2007, the State Environmental Protection Division began the research work. August 2009, the NPC Standing Committee adopted the “active response to climate change resolution” on China to address climate change need to take measures to make the provision. During the year, the National Development and Reform Commission to study the work of a carbon tax designed to include the annual work schedule.

It is understood that the finalization of the carbon tax research report, analysis of the introduction of carbon taxes in our country need and feasibility of introduction of carbon tax in China, the basic objectives and principles, from the perspective of the preliminary design of the tax system factors of carbon tax system basic content, and specifically proposed the implementation of our framework for a carbon tax system. Including carbon taxes and related taxes the functions of the implementation of China’s introduction of a carbon tax road map, and related supporting measures proposed. Currently, the program report being submitted to the NPC Standing Committee and other relevant changes, consider the objective is to begin in 2012, a carbon tax.

Experts acknowledged that the introduction of fuel tax for 10 years before and after the total consumption, the program has been used to fight back, it is estimated will not be so difficult to introduce a carbon tax.

The establishment of a new tax, the most important to consider two questions, one from the production processes or consumption levy is levied? Second, tax rates should be set at what level, higher better or lower better? CCIN is understood that the carbon tax program, experts from the production side or the proposed levy. Because the carbon tax aimed at fossil energy, so this collection methods and collection of fuel tax is the same – from coal producers, oil refiners to charge this end, and then passed on to consumers. Another problem is the tax rate is about how much? This is sensitive. In accordance with the experience of foreign countries, generally every 1 ton of carbon dioxide emission rate of 50 ~ 100 yuan level, which is relatively higher. In order to avoid the relatively large domestic enterprises produce the impact of the recommendations of the program is relatively low tax rate, a large convention in every 1 ton of carbon dioxide emissions of 20 yuan tax. Concrete delivered to the end of fossil energy consumption, the consumption per 1 ton of coal, 1 ton of oil, 1,000 cubic meters of natural gas, have levied 11 yuan, 17 yuan, 12 yuan of the carbon tax.

Under this standard, by 2009, consumption of petroleum and chemical industry-wide data calculations, an annual industry-wide carbon tax would increase taxes about 8.8 billion yuan, accounting for 1.8% of total industry profits. And, as experts expect, the same as the design of the fuel tax, carbon tax will also be the continuous increase of 2020 per tonne of carbon dioxide will reach the level of charge 50 yuan, to gradually move closer to international standards. Petroleum and chemical industries will be the carbon tax will tax doubled.

CCIN reporter learned from a number of companies, on oil and chemical products, carbon tax, there is a “carbon materials” and “fuel carbon” issue of the distinction.

In the petrochemical, chemical fertilizer enterprises with gas, a considerable portion of oil, natural gas is the raw material for petrochemical products do. These products have entered the carbon molecules in the material, in fact, was sealed up the product form. This is different from the oil and natural gas used as fuel, will not turn into carbon dioxide emissions. Such as the large consumption of coal chemical industry – fertilizer, methanol, calcium carbide, acetic acid, coal-to-olefins, ethylene glycol and other coal companies, the majority of coal consumption of synthetic products are carbon molecules, will not turn into carbon dioxide emissions. This is used as fuel in coal (the fuel carbon) is also fundamentally different. If this part of the oil, gas, carbon tax was not levied on net, clearly unreasonable.

There is also a problem. Monopoly of the domestic coal production, the higher coal production enterprises can easily transfer through price increases to the carbon tax burden on downstream industries. The consumption of coal chemical industry as large, for various reasons it can not be transferred through product price increases the carbon tax burden further downstream, will bear a larger tax.

CCIN interview experts, also learned a subversion of the traditional view of environmental protection. In the greenhouse gas issue has not been seriously before refractory chemical materials are considered environmentally unfriendly. But now found that the degradation process occurs in nature mostly carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions from the process. As in the past that the forests are absorbing carbon dioxide, but now found, trees, leaves, wood rot degradation, in turn re-absorption of carbon dioxide emissions in the atmosphere. Now the new requirements from the perspective of carbon dioxide sequestration, chemical, refractory materials, carbon dioxide sequestration is beneficial. The chemical materials the environmental problems left over can be recovered, recycled or buried deep processing to solve it after more than deal with the degradation of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere to be simple, economical and much more. It’s like coal in the form of carbon is buried in the ground is good or carbon dioxide emitted into the same good reason.

Therefore, the production of a number of petrochemical raw materials of carbon products, carbon dioxide sequestration has achieved a lot of respect. This credit is not a long time been recognized, and therefore these petrochemical products have suffered a lot of unredressed injustice, and now may have to be combined indiscriminately, regardless of a carbon tax. This is a can not help but pay attention to science, the question of fairness.

Some experts think that in China the design of a carbon tax, has been implemented in the environment should be considered sewage fee system, tax reform should be first, to avoid double taxation. In addition, it should be noted that China’s chemical enterprises of different ownership, the carbon tax burden is very different. For example, some large state-owned monopoly enterprises with strong income tax can take the form of return to government subsidies, but the private enterprises, SMEs do not have the treatment. Increase in taxes will inevitably increase the burden on enterprises, especially SMEs. Therefore, should the tax rebate in enterprise policy.

Experts also believe that a carbon tax in a punishment mechanism, but also due rewards.

National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Finance of the report, by the central government focused on the carbon tax revenue to support energy conservation, new energy and renewable energy, new energy technology development and other energy-saving industry. One important way is to consider tax rebates for key industries.

Report that the use of carbon tax revenues should be used and means the following: First, tax rebates for key industries and subsidies for low-income groups, etc.; two countries can establish a special fund dedicated to climate change, improve energy efficiency, research new energy-saving technologies, new energy technology development, new energy and renewable energy use, increase the implementation of afforestation projects and to strengthen the exchange of scientific research and management, promoting international exchanges and cooperation in the; Third, the specific use of the way, should be greater use of indirect financial discounts and other concessions, and less by way of direct subsidies, better play the role of carbon taxes.  Also need to establish a standard transfer payment system for special consideration of low-income groups or regions with low levels of economic development, balanced regional distribution of abatement costs and benefits structure. In view of our current economic development level is still low, energy saving aspects of lack of funds needed, therefore, reasonable Di finance using carbon tax revenue to increase in energy Huanbao’s Zhichu.

I am a professional editor from cheaponsale.com, and my work is to promote a free online trade platform.

http://www.cheaponsale.com/ contain a great deal of information about polishing granite tile,christmas ornaments glass balls,christmas curtain lights, welcome to visit!

Technorati Tags: christmas curtain lights, christmas ornaments glass balls, polishing granite tile